On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 19:10, Chad Fowler chad-at-chadfowler.com |stuff|
wrote:
> On 12 Feb 2004, simon strandgaard wrote:
>
> # On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 18:42, Chad Fowler wrote:
> # > On 12 Feb 2004, simon strandgaard wrote:
> # [snip]
> # > # If you need maintainers, then I maybe could maintain the regexp
> # > # testcases.
> # > #
> # >
> # > That would be wonderful. We need to get a feel for how much overlap
> there
> # > currently is with the current "test" directory in the Ruby distribution.
> # >
> #
> # I believe Rubicon is using 'rubyunit', it would be nice if it used
> # 'test::unit' instead. Some time ago I converted the regexp-testcases
> # to using 'test::unit', so that I could test my own regexp engine against
> # rubicon... it passed 92.6% ok, then I discovered a fatal design problem,
> # which send me back to the drawing board. But that a different story.
> #
>
> Yes. It uses rubyunit or Test::Unit's rubyunit compatability mode.
> That's what I started to work on this morning. It's definitely going to
> have to be first on the list.
Whats the second+third entries in the TODO list?
> # I should have time to give it a final touch tomorrow. Then I can mail it
> # to you. Or perhaps there is a cvs-repository?
> #
>
> It's in the CVS repository on cvs.ruby-lang.org. It's probably easiest to
> start out via email for now. I've actually had trouble with my CVS
> account on cvs.ruby-lang.org. Need to get that corrected. We could
> alternatively setup a rubyforge project to work from until we have things
> ready to merge into ruby CVS proper.
Sounds suitable with a rubyforge project for that.
BTW: I am very busy this weekend.. I hope I will get time to prepare the
rubicon regexp testcases for you in the middle in next week.
--
Simon Strandgaard
|
