Re: First attempt at converting RD->RDoc: net/http.rb

Hi,

  In mail "First attempt at converting RD->RDoc: net/http.rb"
    William Webber <wew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Gavin suggested I should have a go at converting the
> documentation in one of the standard library classes from RD
> to RDoc format, then post it here to get feedback on style
> etc..  I've done net/http.rb.  I've also extended,
> corrected, and clarified (I hope!) the documentation from
> the original.

Thank you very much!!  It seems really nice.
I'm going to commit your work to the repository.

Regards,
Minero Aoki