logo       

Re: Deploying multiple projects/applications: msg#00131

lang.ruby.capistrano.general

Subject: Re: Deploying multiple projects/applications


Thanks for your opinion! I do appreciate it as I am doing research on
supporting a dozen or so Linux servers setup as a web farm. Outside
consultants are recommending Zenworks, but I tend to think this is
something that the OSS world has resolved. Will look more into
cfengine/puppet and see if I can figure that tool out to meet this
need.

Take care!

On Nov 16, 3:56 am, "Nicolas Chuche"
<nchu...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I work with cfengine (something like an old puppet's big brother as
> it's almost 10 years old now) and capistrano (to deploy some and check
> java/tomcat apps) and for me the difference is clear :
> - cfengine likes are for maintaining an IT system on the long run. For
> tasks that turn in the background, check things, start service, deploy
> new system packages, ... without the sysadmin
> - capistrano is more high level and more application oriented :
> deploying application, restarting an apache, everything from one
> single server (bastion one).
>
> To summarize, when it must be in the background, it's cfengine/puppet,
> when it's an operator task, capistrano.
>
> That's only my opinion and my way of doing.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise