|
Re: XML::LibXSLT registered functions: a preliminary fix: msg#00042lang.perl.xml
Andrew Green <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:53:59 +0100, Robin Berjon wrote: > >>> But what I _do_ need is reliable registered Perl functions in >>> XML::LibXSLT. Ones that don't blow up and are reliable without (too >>> much) leaking when used in mod_perl. > > Having arrived late to this discussion myself, can I just ask: do *all* > registered Perl functions blow up and/or leak under mod_perl? I'm just > about to put a sprinkling of them into a production environment, and I > haven't noticed anything horrible happening while testing... > > Cheers, > Andrew. No. Unless your functions accept nodesets as arguments (but only flat types - numbers, strings, booleans), you're safe. -- Petr _______________________________________________ Perl-XML mailing list Perl-XML@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: XML::LibXSLT registered functions: a preliminary fix, Petr Pajas |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XML::LibXSLT registered functions: a preliminary fix, Elizabeth Mattijsen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XML::LibXSLT registered functions: a preliminary fix, Andrew Green |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XML::LibXSLT registered functions: a preliminary fix, Petr Pajas |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |