Re: XML::LibXSLT registered functions: a preliminary fix

Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
> This serves my purposes for the time being.  But I wonder whether this 
> is the right thing to do.  On the one hand, you would only use this 
> module if you're actually using registered functions.  On the other 
> hand, I feel this should be in integral part of XML:::LibXML and 
> XML::LibXSLT.  But that would mean an overhead to the destruction of 
> XML::LibXML::Node objects that is not generally needed.

This rocks! :)

Personally I don't mind either way: I still like the idea of having 
registered functions work just the same for LibXSLT and XPathContext, 
and that requires loading a module anyway so loading yours too would be 
fine by me.

I guess the question could also be: at the end of a document's life, do 
all individual nodes get DESTROYed or only those that are directly 
referenced from Perl? If all, then how high is the overhead for each? A 
DOM typically contains a lot of nodes, and even a small overhead for 
each could be a big one overall.

Just my €2/100, thanks for doing this Liz!

--
Robin Berjon
_______________________________________________
Perl-XML mailing list
Perl-XML@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs