|
Hi,
Complete the following sentence
> It's a GUI toolkit.
...that uses XRC (optional) and therefore has an XML Parser (expat) implemented/included... so I think the question is not that absurd.
Seriously, I was wondering if the included parser code is useable via an API...
I think you are creating wxWidgets apps with wxPerl *G* (but that's interessting, is it a point of view or... okay getting to much OT ), but you are right on this mailinglist we talk about wxPerl!
Very kind that you are reminding me! I nearly forgot about that.
Greetz & blessings
Manuel Renz
P.s.:
http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html
--> Be especially careful with sarcasm. <--
--
=======================================================================
Karlshöhe Ludwigsburg | Telefon: 07141 / 965 - 114
ZDL Öffentlichkeitsreferat | Fax: 07141 / 965 - 113
Auf der Karlshöhe 3 | eMail: zdloer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
71638 Ludwigsburg | WWW: http://www.karlshoehe.de
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DH [mailto:crazyinsomniac@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 4:10 PM
> To: ZDL_Öffentlichkeitsreferat; 'wxperl-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: [wxperl-users] XML Parser included...
>
>
> > In spite of that, for me the arguments of the wxWidgets
> people (including
> > Mattia's) are not that logical.
>
> *shock* logical?
> It's a GUI toolkit.
> The wxWidgets people don't care because in c++, expat is expat
> (you get expat anyway you want it).
> XML::Parser is based on expat.
> Why don't you try to see if you can mix it up with wxPerl
> (It's as simple as "if you want it, you write it")
>
>
> > Now my second question is:
> > "Which XML parser do you use in your wxWidgets (wxWindows)
> app and why?"
>
> I don't create many wxWidgets apps.
> I create wxPerl apps. As such I use my favorite, XML::Twig.
> If you wan't to know about wxWidgets, try asking on their
> mailing list.
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
> http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
>
| 
