Re: Solved: synchronizing STDERR and STDOUT

On 22 Sep 2006, at 16:51, David E. Wheeler wrote:

> On Sep 21, 2006, at 17:43, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
> > The hack will only work for Test::Builder based tests.  I said  
> > this last month when it came up.  You could write a hack for  
> > Test.pm too, but not everyone uses Test.pm either.  You're going  
> > to continually be writing hacks for different test implementations.
> I think that if Ovid hacked Test.pm, then he'd have a 99.99%  
> solution. Good enough, no?
Even then the 0.01% left wouldn't have worse behaviour with TAPx::P  
that T::H and friends - no?
Adrian