On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Bill Smith wrote:
his group has a shortage of "Easy" quizzes. Most of the "Expert"
quizzes are difficult because they require expertise in the problem
domain. If we allowed (even encouraged) early posting of "Spoiler"
design information, far more of us could participate by producing perl
implementations. Yes, there are a lot of details to work out if there
is interest in this approach.
Surely the point of the spoiler time limit is to let people crack on with
their design, so a range of strategies are seen, without being distracted
down a maybe more obvious path ? There's nothing to stop anyone posting a
solution after the next week's quiz has been posted or after the official
summariser has posted, if they either think their way is
different/better/creative, nor to post it and ask for critique. In fact,
some people do this already. I think I prefer the current situation,
though maybe there is a demand for qotw-algorithms-discuss, less code,
more maths, geeking off at a different tangent ?
the hatter