logo       

Re: Easy/Expert quizzes: msg#00023

lang.perl.qotw.discuss

Subject: Re: Easy/Expert quizzes

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Bill Smith wrote:

> This group has a shortage of "Easy" quizzes. Most of the "Expert"
> quizzes are difficult because they require expertise in the problem
> domain. If we allowed (even encouraged) early posting of "Spoiler"
> design information, far more of us could participate by producing perl
> implementations. Yes, there are a lot of details to work out if there
> is interest in this approach.

Surely the point of the spoiler time limit is to let people crack on with
their design, so a range of strategies are seen, without being distracted
down a maybe more obvious path ? There's nothing to stop anyone posting a
solution after the next week's quiz has been posted or after the official
summariser has posted, if they either think their way is
different/better/creative, nor to post it and ask for critique. In fact,
some people do this already. I think I prefer the current situation,
though maybe there is a demand for qotw-algorithms-discuss, less code,
more maths, geeking off at a different tangent ?


the hatter




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise