Quoting Mark Jason Dominus <mjd-ZxR0713JXSrQT0dZR+AlfA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 5. With all this discussion, I was surprised to see how few of the
> submitted solutions actually worked properly for the
> straightforward cases: Postive integers in ascending order with no
> repeats. Of the 21 samples I tested, several failed some of the
> basic cases. (See
> http://perl.plover.com/qotw/misc/r006/RESULTS/format/NOTOK . )
I was surprised to see my program as part of the incorrect solutions. I did a
quick bit of investigating and noticed that you changed my function to use a '-'
as a range separator instead of '..'. I guess this made it easier to test, but
by doing so you broke the function :)
I guess you could call it bad design on my part, and I did veer from the spec by
using '..'.
I have to say that I don't envy your task in having to sift through all this
code to try and make everything work with your test harness...
Cees
|
