Re: Fwd: Re: POE::Component::Client::DNS woes

Untested: "spawn" several several PoCo::Client::DNS aliases. You could
either strictly round-robin your posting to the spawned resolvers in
start_next_lookup. Or, if you really want to balance things out, keep up
with how many queries each resolver is currently handling by incrementing
some counter at the start of start_next_lookup and decrementing it in
got_answer. Then choose a resolver accordingly (don't forget to randomly
pick from resolvers that are available).
-
Lance Braswell - + 1 469 357 6112


                                                                           
             "Lari Huttunen"                                               
             <perl-poe-001@hut                                             
             tu.net>                                                    To 
                                       <poe@xxxxxxxx>                      
             04/28/2005 01:45                                           cc 
             PM                                                            
                                                                   Subject 
                                       Fwd: Re:                            
             Please respond to         POE::Component::Client::DNS woes    
             <perl-poe-001@hut                                             
                  tu.net>                                                  
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




Oops, sorry forgot to CC: the list.

        ------  Original Message  ------
Subject: Re: POE::Component::Client::DNS woes
To:      Mathieu Longtin <mrdamnfrenchy@xxxxxxxxx>
From:    "Lari Huttunen" <perl-poe-001@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:    Thu, 28 Apr 2005 21:39:57 +0300


On 21:00:51 28/04/2005 Mathieu Longtin <mrdamnfrenchy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hum, if the first DNS servers works, why should it try the
> other ones?

To even out the query load between the different servers, but yes I see
your point. :) Which means that I will probably have implement some kind
of a round-robin logic for the queries, maybe? I would like to use the
exisiting modules but what I was looking for is distribution of the query
load between many different nameservers.

--
Sincerely,

Lari Huttunen