Re: extend.c:Parrot_call

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Leopold Toetsch wrote:

> E.g. when you have a sub that ends with:
>
>   set P5, 100 # ret value
>   set I0, 0   # non-prototyped
>   set I3, 0   # no return value
>   invoke P1   # return
>
> then P5 will not be passed to the caller.

right.  but i'm explicitly using .pcc_begin_return/.return/.pcc_end_return
to return values from subs run with  Parrot_call.  my C code then
retrieves the return value from I5, which is where the return integer
value would be copied.  your changes would save me from having to fetch
directly from I5, but until those changes are made, is this the "right
way" to be doing this?

-jeff