Stéphane Payrard <stef@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 12:19:22PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> Having a type enum for these abstract types would imply to install a
>> vtable, filled with methods that catch errors.
> I never proposed the installation of vtables for these types.
Well, then a type enum for abstract types is probably not useful anyway.
> there should be an integer range reserved for these abstract types.
> Being outside the range for regular pmc type they would not
> need any vtable.
And then?
leo
|
Try Searching:
servers, voip, java, networking, microsoft ...
|
|
|
| 
