|
Re: Perl 6 and byte code: msg#00564lang.perl.perl6.internals
Dan Sugalski <dan@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Bytecode files on-disk are > shared across all the processes in the system, so you only get one > in-memory copy of a file, which saves both RAM and load time if you're > using a file that another process is using. I assume this means that the plan is to mmap these files. Are most systems happy with hundreds (or thousands) of mapped sections of memory or are there some negative performance implications of doing that? How about the code JITed from the bytecodes. Will it be shared? Regards, Gisle |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: analogy pmc/content with inode/file: 00564, Dan Sugalski |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Perl 6 and byte code: 00564, Dan Sugalski |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Perl 6 and byte codei: 00564, Peter Hickman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Perl 6 and byte code: 00564, Dan Sugalski |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |