Re: [pm-h] complex data structure help

Paul Archer wrote:
> 11:31am, Paul Archer wrote:
>
>   
>> <snip>
>>
>> Only that seems inefficient. Could I normalize that somehow?
>>     
> I talked this over with a coworker. He suggested one table each for users, 
> client machines, and filesystems, just for lookups. Then one table for a 
> combination of the three, and one table for timeperiods with the bytes 
> written or read for each time period.
>   

That's not just normalized...it's first normal form. ;)

(more or less)
Matt