On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 12:27:16PM +0100, Alessandro Ranellucci wrote:
> I see on Plucene's POD that its index files aren't compatible with
> Lucene until someone works on it.
> - is anybody working on this bug/feature?
> - how much work would it take to me if I decide to contribute?
Not that I know of. IIUC correctly it's fairly difficult to "fix"
because of 16 bit vs 32 bit issues. But I may have misunderstood.
I'm also reasonably skeptical about being able to improve performance
significantly of Plucene as a whole without completely smashing the goal
of compatability with Lucene index files.
> - does Plucene work with mod_perl?
Yes.
> - apart from performance, does Plucene differ in some sensible way from
> Lucene (I mean indexing flexibility, search results quality etc.)?
Other than recent additions or changes within Lucene that haven't yet
been ported, I don't believe so. It was a direct port, so should perform
identically.
Tony
|
