On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:15:14AM -0400, Ken Williams wrote:
> >>>There could probably be a little more consistency between files:
> >>>order of test initialization, variables names (i.e. MB objects are
> >>>variously called $b, $m, $build, etc.), etc.
> >>$b should be avoided because of its Magic nature. I like $mb.
> >
> >$mb it is.
>
> It's fine to standardize, but I think it's not all that important
> actually - if we're keeping our variables scoped fairly tightly, it's
> not too difficult to follow. Conversely, if we need to use a naming
> convention throughout the testing code to make it followable, then
> someone who doesn't know the testing code very well might have a hard
> time following it.
I think its safe to say its not going overboard to agree on a convention for
the single most used item in the Module::Build suite.
--
Michael G Schwern schwern@xxxxxxxxx http://www.pobox.com/~schwern
Ahh email, my old friend. Do you know that revenge is a dish that is best
served cold? And it is very cold on the Internet!
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
|
