At 22:30 -0600 12/21/03, Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Ken Williams wrote:
> I'd like to eventually move Module::Build development to perforce. I
> can import the CVS history from the sourceforge project. I've set up a
> server in my house on my DSL line. Not real heavy-duty, but it should
> suffice.
> Any objections?
I for one prefer to use free software when possible. What's so great
about Perforce that we shouldn't use it instead of Arch, Subversion, or
one of a bazillion other free alternatives?
I know that Subversion has been tried for the Ponie project. I think
I can still hear Arthur scream whenever Subversion gets mentioned.
It was particularly difficult to get any performance out of it with a
relatively large number of branches.
I don't know about the bazillion other free alternatives.
Liz
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
| 
