On Wednesday, October 22, 2003, at 08:15 PM, Randy W. Sims wrote:
On 10/15/2003 11:08 PM, Randy W. Sims wrote:
On 10/15/2003 8:46 AM, Ken Williams wrote:
BTW, wouldn't it be better to use Pod::Parser in the dist_*
routines for more acurate results?
Probably so, yeah. Is that a core module?
-Ken
Yeah, though I'm not sure when it was added. The attached patch
should be safe though.
Randy.
I forgot to follow up on this. I also forgot how easy it is to find
out when a module was added to CORE with Module::CoreList:
$ perl -MModule::CoreList -e "print
Module::CoreList->first_release('Pod::Parser')"
5.006
Even though it's kind of new, I'd recommend using it if it's present
since the current method is flawed.
Okay, I've committed a patch that uses Pod::Parser if available. I
based it on your code, but moved it out into a new
Module::Build::PodParser module that can transmogrify itself based on
whether Pod::Parser is available.
-Ken
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open
Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new
features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
|
