* Andriy Gapon (agaponrmthis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) [030727 22:41]:
> all I am saying is that there is no option for forward() to do what (some at
> least) user agents do when one uses "forward as attachment" e.g H,F in pine or
> Message->Forward As->Attachment in mozilla.
Maybe I have to reconsider the way that the ATTACH is handled (anyone
else with an opinion on this on the list?) I think the modification
from multipart to message/rfc822 will not break applications.
Can you provide me a demonstration for two applications, so two sets
of an original and related attached-forwarded messages? I would like to
see which games are played with the headers.
--
Thanks,
MarkOv
------------------------------------------------------------------------
drs Mark A.C.J. Overmeer MARKOV Solutions
Mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx solutions@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://Mark.Overmeer.net http://solutions.overmeer.net
|
