"Christopher J. Madsen" <cjm@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Attached is a patch against LWP 5.79 to allow File::Listing to
> interpret the output of GNU ls's --full-time option. This allows you
> to get timestamps accurate to the second, instead of the minute-based
> ones you get with a normal "ls -l".
The patch did not apply here. Are you patching from a pristine 5.79?
[gisle@ask lwp5]$ patch -p0 <full-time.patch
patching file lib/File/Listing.pm
Hunk #2 FAILED at 372.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 1.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 84.
3 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file lib/File/Listing.pm.rej
Anyway, this is how --full-time comes out here (Redhat 9). It does
not appear to be the same format you try to parse.
[gisle@ask lwp5]$ ls -l --full-time
total 368
-rw-rw-r-- 1 gisle gisle 3800 2004-04-07 12:44:47.000000000 +0200
AUTHORS
drwxrwxr-x 3 gisle gisle 4096 2004-06-14 14:59:56.000000000 +0200
bin
drwxrwxr-x 7 gisle gisle 4096 2004-06-14 14:59:58.000000000 +0200
blib
-rw-rw-r-- 1 gisle gisle 83867 2004-06-14 19:30:48.000000000 +0200
Changes
[gisle@ask lwp5]$ ls --version
ls (coreutils) 4.5.3
Written by Richard Stallman and David MacKenzie.
Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Regards,
Gisle
> I believe it also handles BSD ls's -T option, but I don't have a BSD
> system to test. I'm just working off the OpenBSD manpage.
>
> The new time formats are recognized automatically; you just call
> parse_dir like you normally would.
|
