On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 01:16:28AM +0200, Steven P Schubiger wrote:
> On 9 Apr, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> : On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 03:24:20PM -0700, Steven P Schubiger wrote:
> :> 5) Change ExtUtils:MM wherever Module::Build can benefit from.
> :
> : Could you elaborate on this one some?
>
> As you're wearing the MakeMaker hat, I had hoped, you'd outline
> the path to go; but perhaps, I misunderstood the idea and we shouldn't
> be "extending" MakeMaker, if it can be avoided; thus, becoming more
> likely that people will merge over to Module::Build.
I'm still not 100% sure what you mean by changes to MM to benefit MB, but
here goes...
* split out the auxillary modules (ExtUtils::Install, etc...) from
MakeMaker so MB can use/upgrade them without an MM dependency. This depends
on Module::Install so...
* polish up Module::Install so it works everywhere
* move the PREFIX logic out of MakeMaker and into some auxillary, probably
ExtUtils::Install.
* maybe move the INSTALL_BASE logic there, too.
> What's your overall impression of the proposal, anyways?
I've only skimmed it. At the moment my brain is locked onto on the "change
ExtUtils::MakeMaker" part.
|
Try Searching:
servers, voip, java, networking, microsoft ...
|
|
|
|