|
Re: Rose::DB::Object subclass instances within Safe compartment: msg#00033lang.perl.modules.dbi.rose-db-object
On 6/6/06, Svilen Ivanov <svilen.ivanov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > John, would you resend your answer to the mailing list again? Probably > you replied to Ethan directly... My entire reply is already quoted below. -John > 2006/6/6, Ethan Rowe <ethan-O9fzpki4YnJWk0Htik3J/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> John Siracusa wrote: >>> If related objects are fetched by the Manager due to require_objects or >>> with_objects parameters, they should be attached as full-fledged objects. >>> Can you can show me an instance (sample code) where this is not the case? >> >> That's good to know; I was making something of an off-the-cuff observation >> that I knew might be wrong. I'll reproduce the error I got and pass it along >> if it appears somehow inconsistent with what you've just described. >> >> Thanks. >> - Ethan
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Rose::DB::Object subclass instances within Safe compartment, Svilen Ivanov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Adding new column types, Cees Hek |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Rose::DB::Object subclass instances within Safe compartment, Svilen Ivanov |
| Next by Thread: | DBIx::Class or Rose::DB::Object or other???, Kurt Hansen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |