Re: Rose::DB::Object subclass instances within Safe compartment

John, would you resend your answer to the mailing list again? Probably
you replied to Ethan directly...

2006/6/6, Ethan Rowe <ethan-O9fzpki4YnJWk0Htik3J/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> John Siracusa wrote:
>
> > If related objects are fetched by the Manager due to require_objects
> > or with_objects parameters, they should be attached as full-fledged
> > objects.  Can you can show me an instance (sample code) where this is
> > not the case?
>
> That's good to know; I was making something of an off-the-cuff
> observation that I knew might be wrong.  I'll reproduce the error I got
> and pass it along if it appears somehow inconsistent with what you've
> just described.
>
> Thanks.
> - Ethan
>
> --
> Ethan Rowe
> End Point Corporation
> ethan-O9fzpki4YnJWk0Htik3J/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rose-db-object mailing list
> Rose-db-object-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
>