On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 15:16:53 -0400, Mark Stosberg wrote:
Hi Mark, Matt
Firstly, many thanx for taking my patch on board.
(Matt: I'd had no indication it's been accepted).
I'd prefer the latest docs (now on RT) to be used, even though they are almost
word-for-word the same, since - for one thing - I corrected an error in the
original (not my previous) example, in calling is_expired() and not expired().
Also the docs refer to load() and perhaps should refer to _load(). Up to you.
Feel free the patch my patch on this matter.
And yes, there's a nice new test which is definitely worth including. Source is
on RT.
--
Cheers
Ron Savage, ron-p/nmRYE4fVlx3z9c7Zyw2w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 11/06/2006
http://savage.net.au/index.html
Let the record show: Microsoft is not an Australian company
|
