Re: Module idea "hack2pack" that generates packages from scripts

Robert Rothenberg wrote:
>
[snip]
> In other words, I start off with a proof of concept 'hack' that evolves 
> into a module. (When I start with h2xs, I find I am constantly renaming 
> things, moving them around, etc.)
Is this "constant renaming" and "moving things around" a result of using 
h2xs?  Or is it just your own style of work?  And is it necessarily a 
bad thing?
> So the obvious thing to do is to have a kind of 'hack2pack' script that 
> parses the script and generates the appropriate modules, and test file. 
How would having a hack2pack script preclude one from "constant 
renaming" and "moving things around" (or reduce the incidence thereof?)
jimk