* Jos? Castro (jac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> * Paul Johnson (paul@xxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 08:40:51PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> >
> > > On Saturday 26 March 2005 20:18, Sherzod Ruzmetov wrote:
> > > > There is no use of, nor benefit from keeping "Makefile", "MANIFEST" and
> > > > "META.yml" files under version control.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Well, "Makefile" is obviously being generated from Makefile.PL. However,
> > > "MANIFEST" is not. I just tried deleting the MANIFEST, and running "perl
> > > Makefile.PL; make dist". I got an empty distribution. One should maintain
> > > MANIFEST manually.
> >
> > make manifest
>
> Of course, `make manifest` *assumes* a bunch of not be accurate.. I
"a bunch of stuff that might not"
> have modules with test files that I don't want in the distribution,
> since hey only run in my machine, for instance.
>
> > > Thanks for your opinion regarding META.yml.
> >
> > You can manually add information to META.yml which cannot be generated
> > automatically. If you do so, then keeping it under version control is
> > sensible.
> >
> > --
> > Paul Johnson - paul@xxxxxxxx
> > http://www.pjcj.net
> --
> Jose Alves de Castro <cog@xxxxxxxx>
> http://jose-castro.org/
--
Jose Alves de Castro <cog@xxxxxxxx>
http://jose-castro.org/
|
