I was wondering if there was any aim or intent to make interface classes purely
abstract?
It seems that some interfaces (e.g., RangeI )contain extensive implementation
and others
e.g., Bio::RichSeqI are indeed abstract. As far as I know it's deemed A Good
Idea to have
interfaces abstract.
Some changes would just involve creating a base class implementing the
interface, which I'd volunteer
to do, at least for the classes I use regularly.
Or is it too late to do this now without breaking everyone's code?
Richard
Dr Richard Adams
Bioinformatician,
Psychiatric Genetics Group,
Medical Genetics,
Molecular Medicine Centre,
Western General Hospital,
Crewe Rd West,
Edinburgh UK
EH4 2XU
Tel: 44 131 651 1084
richard.adams@xxxxxxxx
|
