On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 09:30:24AM +0200, Nicolas Cannasse wrote:
> Is a multiset "common usage" enough to be included into ExtLib ?
I'm sure there are at least two users (the author and myslef)... However
I think it's in general nice to have this kind of data structure... I
mean, it can be easily implemented in a number of way, but as it's
already there why reinvent the wheel ?
I agree that if included and not used by anybody it's waste of resources
and time to maintain it.
The same reasoning can be applied to a "set of sets" (or set of
multiset) data structure that can be easily implemented via functors
using the set module, but it would be nice to have it in a library...
p
--
++ "All great truths begin as blasphemies." -George Bernard Shaw
++ Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek
For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35
or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th!
http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297
|
Try Searching:
servers, voip, java, networking, microsoft ...
|
|
|
|