Nicolas Cannasse wrote:
Hi !
I've have modified the DynArray module so it does not need anymore a null
value. The only (small) tradeoff is that float dynarrays are boxed and that
we need to copy element-by-element from and to float arrays instead of using
Array primitives who must be faster.
Thanks!
I think this is a good start: it gets the interface right.
It is probably worth showing the Ocaml team, and asking what
they'd do to support unboxed arrays. Note that floats won't
be the only unboxed arrays, there's a good chance the team
is working to unbox all arrays of scalar types.
--
John Max Skaller, mailto:skaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
snail:10/1 Toxteth Rd, Glebe, NSW 2037, Australia.
voice:61-2-9660-0850
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
|
Try Searching:
servers, voip, java, networking, microsoft ...
|
|
|
| 
