|
|
Subject: RE: Re[2]: Nemerle for VisualStudio redist. - msg#00108
List: lang.nemerle.devel
> i think the same, and i'm the one, who are struggling for adding
> refactoring to the integration
You'd better not struggle, but finished at least one rename refactoring.
It's necessary to finish "find usages/references" at first. You are starting
a lot of tasks and never finish them. We should never get anything working
this way. We'd finally have to hide all this features because no one of them
is working properly.
Was this page helpful?
Thread at a glance:
Previous Message by Date:
click to view message preview
Re[2]: Nemerle for VisualStudio redist.
Hello Paul,
> * Almost no support for debugging.
i'd rather say that debug works, but inconveniently (awkward)
regards, phantom
Next Message by Date:
click to view message preview
RE: Nemerle for VisualStudio redist.
> Already known issues:
> * Does not work on Win64
> * Solution Explorer works only when "Always show Solution" option is on.
> * Multiple projects per solution are not supported yet.
> * Class View not implemented
> * No (re)formatting.
> * Almost no support for debugging.
+
* No complete in type of methods parameters and return type of method,
properties and fields.
* Not supported completion of some keywords.
* Reference on assemblies not work properly (for example, project of
compiler don't work properly).
* When try add new method you can get incorrect result (incorrect parsing).
Workaround: insert space outside methods/properties bodies and fields
initialize expressions (in class or namespace, for example).
* Methods parameter hints don't work for constructors, arrays and lists.
* Goto members of types defined in referenced assemblies if no .pdb (debug
info) no generates code from metadata.
Many of bugs (incompleteness) depend on the compiler issue. We work under it
resolving, but if some one can help - do it, please :).
Previous Message by Thread:
click to view message preview
Re[2]: Nemerle for VisualStudio redist.
Hello Kamil,
> I was able to install it on VS2005. Nice to have intelli sense. The
> refactoring was the second
> thing that caught my attention. Apart from rename, which does not work
sorry, it was just a stab
> unfortunately, I would be glad to have extract method and extract local
> variable; these are the ones most useful.
i think the same, and i'm the one, who are struggling for adding
refactoring to the integration
it's not so easy, i'm working alone on it, so you should wait for
refactoring support :(
regards, phantom
Next Message by Thread:
click to view message preview
Re[4]: Nemerle for VisualStudio redist.
Hello vc,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 3:40:47 PM, you wrote:
>> i think the same, and i'm the one, who are struggling for adding
>> refactoring to the integration
> You'd better not struggle, but finished at least one rename refactoring.
> It's necessary to finish "find usages/references" at first. You are starting
> a lot of tasks and never finish them. We should never get anything working
> this way. We'd finally have to hide all this features because no one of them
> is working properly.
man, i'm working on it now
i'm stubborn, you know,
but i will hurry up with find usages
from your side, i want help with 2 bugs which bother me and prevent
normal work
regards, phantom
|
|