lang.nasm.devel (thread)

Re: [Nasm-bugs] [ nasm-Feature Requests-1764085 ] Mach-O 64-bit object support, anonymous coward
- Re: [Nasm-bugs] [ nasm-Feature Requests-1764085 ] Mach-O 64-bit object support, H. Peter Anvin
  - Re: [Nasm-bugs] [ nasm-Feature Requests-1764085 ] Mach-O 64-bit object support, anonymous coward
    - Re: [Nasm-bugs] [ nasm-Feature Requests-1764085 ] Mach-O 64-bit object support, H. Peter Anvin
    - Re: [Nasm-bugs] [ nasm-Feature Requests-1764085 ] Mach-O 64-bit object support, anonymous coward
Macros for filenames, H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Macros for filenames, anonymous coward
  - Re: Macros for filenames, H. Peter Anvin
    - Re: Macros for filenames, anonymous coward
    - Re: Macros for filenames, H. Peter Anvin
    - Re: Macros for filenames, anonymous coward
    - Re: Macros for filenames, H. Peter Anvin
    - Re: Macros for filenames, H. Peter Anvin
    - Re: Macros for filenames, anonymous coward
    - Re: Macros for filenames, H. Peter Anvin
  - Re: Macros for filenames, H. Peter Anvin
    - Re: Macros for filenames, anonymous coward
Re: [Nasm-cvs] UDx instructions are 186+, not 286+, anonymous coward
- Re: [Nasm-cvs] UDx instructions are 186+, not 286+, H. Peter Anvin
  - Re: [Nasm-cvs] UDx instructions are 186+, not 286+, anonymous coward
Is this thing on?, H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Is this thing on?, Andreas Ericsson
  - Re: Is this thing on?, H. Peter Anvin
    - Re: Is this thing on?, anonymous coward
    - Re: Is this thing on?, H. Peter Anvin
    - Re: Is this thing on?, Andreas Ericsson
    - Re: Is this thing on?, H. Peter Anvin
    - Re: Is this thing on?, Keith Kanios
NASM 2.03rc1, H. Peter Anvin
Could someone please look at BR 1971687?, H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Could someone please look at BR 1971687?, H. Peter Anvin
AVX completed..., H. Peter Anvin
Regression testing, Victor van den Elzen
- Re: Regression testing, H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Regression testing, H. Peter Anvin
Help me save the turtles, anidotnet
AVX machinery..., H. Peter Anvin
More user-friendly bytecodes?, H. Peter Anvin
- Re: More user-friendly bytecodes?, anonymous coward
  - Re: More user-friendly bytecodes?, H. Peter Anvin
    - Re: More user-friendly bytecodes?, anonymous coward
    - Re: More user-friendly bytecodes?, H. Peter Anvin
- Re: More user-friendly bytecodes?, Charles Crayne
  - Re: More user-friendly bytecodes?, H. Peter Anvin
    - Re: More user-friendly bytecodes?, H. Peter Anvin
    - Re: More user-friendly bytecodes?, anonymous coward
CPU directive stuff, again..., H. Peter Anvin
The CPU directive and its meaning, H. Peter Anvin
- Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, H. Peter Anvin
  - Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, Peter Johnson
    - Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, H. Peter Anvin
- Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, Charles Crayne
  - Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, Peter Johnson
    - Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, anonymous coward
    - Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, Charles Crayne
    - Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, H. Peter Anvin
    - Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, H. Peter Anvin
  - Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, anonymous coward
    - Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, anonymous coward
  - Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, H. Peter Anvin
    - Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, anonymous coward
    - Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, Charles Crayne
    - Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, H. Peter Anvin
EQU and critical expression, H. Peter Anvin
- Re: EQU and critical expression, Charles Crayne
  - Re: EQU and critical expression, H. Peter Anvin
    - Re: EQU and critical expression, Charles Crayne
AVX machinery hopefully complete, H. Peter Anvin
Re: [Nasm-cvs] First cut at AVX machinery., Charles Crayne
- Re: [Nasm-cvs] First cut at AVX machinery., anonymous coward