lang.nasm.devel (date)

lang.nasm.devel (date)

May 31, 2008

Re: Is this thing on?, Keith Kanios
Re: Macros for filenames, H. Peter Anvin
Re: Macros for filenames, anonymous coward

May 30, 2008

Re: Macros for filenames, H. Peter Anvin
Re: Macros for filenames, H. Peter Anvin
Re: Macros for filenames, anonymous coward
Re: [Nasm-bugs] [ nasm-Feature Requests-1764085 ] Mach-O 64-bit object support, anonymous coward
Re: [Nasm-bugs] [ nasm-Feature Requests-1764085 ] Mach-O 64-bit object support, H. Peter Anvin
Re: Macros for filenames, H. Peter Anvin
Re: Macros for filenames, anonymous coward
Re: Macros for filenames, anonymous coward
Re: [Nasm-bugs] [ nasm-Feature Requests-1764085 ] Mach-O 64-bit object support, anonymous coward
Re: Macros for filenames, H. Peter Anvin
Re: [Nasm-bugs] [ nasm-Feature Requests-1764085 ] Mach-O 64-bit object support, H. Peter Anvin
Re: Macros for filenames, H. Peter Anvin
Re: [Nasm-bugs] [ nasm-Feature Requests-1764085 ] Mach-O 64-bit object support, anonymous coward
Re: Macros for filenames, anonymous coward
Macros for filenames, H. Peter Anvin

May 29, 2008

Re: Is this thing on?, H. Peter Anvin
Re: Is this thing on?, Andreas Ericsson

May 28, 2008

Re: Is this thing on?, H. Peter Anvin
Re: Is this thing on?, anonymous coward
Re: [Nasm-cvs] UDx instructions are 186+, not 286+, anonymous coward
Re: Is this thing on?, H. Peter Anvin
Re: [Nasm-cvs] UDx instructions are 186+, not 286+, H. Peter Anvin
Re: Is this thing on?, Andreas Ericsson
Re: [Nasm-cvs] UDx instructions are 186+, not 286+, anonymous coward
Is this thing on?, H. Peter Anvin
Re: Regression testing, H. Peter Anvin
Re: Could someone please look at BR 1971687?, H. Peter Anvin

May 26, 2008

NASM 2.03rc1, H. Peter Anvin
Re: Regression testing, H. Peter Anvin
Could someone please look at BR 1971687?, H. Peter Anvin

May 24, 2008

AVX completed..., H. Peter Anvin

May 21, 2008

Regression testing, Victor van den Elzen
Help me save the turtles, anidotnet
AVX machinery..., H. Peter Anvin

May 15, 2008

Re: More user-friendly bytecodes?, Charles Crayne
Re: More user-friendly bytecodes?, anonymous coward
Re: More user-friendly bytecodes?, H. Peter Anvin
Re: More user-friendly bytecodes?, H. Peter Anvin
Re: More user-friendly bytecodes?, H. Peter Anvin

May 14, 2008

Re: More user-friendly bytecodes?, anonymous coward
Re: More user-friendly bytecodes?, H. Peter Anvin
Re: More user-friendly bytecodes?, anonymous coward
More user-friendly bytecodes?, H. Peter Anvin
CPU directive stuff, again..., H. Peter Anvin

May 13, 2008

Re: EQU and critical expression, Charles Crayne
Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, H. Peter Anvin
Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, Charles Crayne
Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, H. Peter Anvin
Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, anonymous coward
Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, H. Peter Anvin
Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, H. Peter Anvin
Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, Charles Crayne
Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, anonymous coward
Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, anonymous coward
Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, anonymous coward
Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, Peter Johnson
Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, Charles Crayne
Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, H. Peter Anvin
Re: EQU and critical expression, H. Peter Anvin
Re: EQU and critical expression, Charles Crayne
Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, Peter Johnson
Re: The CPU directive and its meaning, H. Peter Anvin
The CPU directive and its meaning, H. Peter Anvin
EQU and critical expression, H. Peter Anvin

May 07, 2008

AVX machinery hopefully complete, H. Peter Anvin

May 05, 2008

Re: [Nasm-cvs] First cut at AVX machinery., anonymous coward
Re: [Nasm-cvs] First cut at AVX machinery., Charles Crayne

News | FAQ | advertise