lang.nasm.devel (date)

lang.nasm.devel (date)

April 30, 2007

Re: Equivalent to ife?, H. Peter Anvin
Equivalent to ife?, Aitor Santamaría

April 29, 2007

Terrific gains possible!, Philipp Costales

April 28, 2007

Microsoft Windows Vista ready to download, Loraine Lugo
Re: Elf64!!!, H. Peter Anvin
Re: Elf64!!!, Charles Crayne
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, Frank Kotler

April 27, 2007

Elf64!!!, Frank Kotler

April 24, 2007

Immense gains on frankfurt., Jimi Reyes
Frankfurt exchange news!, Scottie sicotte

April 22, 2007

It was Tomis who moved first., Cori Gentry
Work becomes exciting and "interesting" again, but their social life now seems to be filled with clearly very stupid people who do not know the fashionable conversations., chriis Falco
Lists of best-selling books ., Baldwin

April 21, 2007

oem express, Gus Ratliff
regvals and regflags, H. Peter Anvin

April 20, 2007

Truly odd problem in current CVS, H. Peter Anvin
Re: Additional Help.., Daniel R. Blair
Re: Additional Help.., H. Peter Anvin
Additional Help.., M Crilly
nero 6.6 oem suite, Betty Morin

April 19, 2007

Re: More thoughts on the RIP-relative addressing issue, Brian Raiter
Re: More thoughts on the RIP-relative addressing issue, anonymous coward
Re: More thoughts on the RIP-relative addressing issue, anonymous coward

April 18, 2007

Re: More thoughts on the RIP-relative addressing issue, H. Peter Anvin
Re: More thoughts on the RIP-relative addressing issue, Brian Raiter
lined resurrect, Rosalie Bolton
Version number of the next release, H. Peter Anvin
Re: REG_C8REG, anonymous coward
Re: REG_C8REG, anonymous coward
Re: REG_C8REG, Keith Kanios
Re: REG_C8REG, spook
Re: REG_C8REG, spook
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, anonymous coward
Re: REG_C8REG, H. Peter Anvin
Re: REG_C8REG, anonymous coward
Re: REG_C8REG, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
Re: REG_C8REG, H. Peter Anvin
Re: REG_C8REG, H. Peter Anvin
Re: REG_C8REG, H. Peter Anvin
Re: REG_C8REG, Keith Kanios
Re: REG_C8REG, Keith Kanios
Re: REG_C8REG, spook
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, anonymous coward
Re: REG_C8REG, anonymous coward

April 17, 2007

Specifies the field of the message., Venessa Marbes
WWN Issue 281 was released today., camil polina
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, Phil Carmody
Re: REG_C8REG, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, Keith Kanios
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, anonymous coward
Re: DQ in 32-bit mode, anonymous coward
Re: REG_C8REG, Keith Kanios
Re: REG_C8REG, H. Peter Anvin
Re: REG_C8REG, Keith Kanios
ndisasm, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM git tree, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
REG_C8REG, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
Testing..., H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
More thoughts on the RIP-relative addressing issue, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
DQ in 32-bit mode, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, spook
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
64-bit ndisasm; bug in 64-bit assembly, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
Re: 64-bit ndisasm; bug in 64-bit assembly, H. Peter Anvin
Re: 64-bit ndisasm; bug in 64-bit assembly, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, spook
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, spook

April 16, 2007

Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, spook
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, Keith Kanios
Re: 64-bit ndisasm; bug in 64-bit assembly, spook
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, anonymous coward
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, Keith Kanios
Re: 64-bit ndisasm; bug in 64-bit assembly, Keith Kanios
anonymous CVS is down, anonymous coward
Re: 64-bit ndisasm; bug in 64-bit assembly, anonymous coward
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, anonymous coward
OEM?, Lois Skaggs
RIP-Relative Addressing Suggestion, Keith Kanios
Re: RIP-Relative Addressing Fixes, Keith Kanios
babe, amnesty
RIP-Relative Addressing Fixes, Keith Kanios
Re: 64-bit ndisasm; bug in 64-bit assembly, spook
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, spook
Re: 64-bit ndisasm; bug in 64-bit assembly, spook
Re: nasm.sf.net page bug, keith
Re: 64-bit ndisasm; bug in 64-bit assembly, spook
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, spook
Re: [Nasm-users] nasm: unrecognised output format "macho" - need help, Frank Kotler

April 15, 2007

Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, spook
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, spook
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, spook
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, spook
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, spook
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, Frank Kotler
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, spook
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, spook

April 14, 2007

Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, Frank Kotler
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, Frank Kotler
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, Keith Kanios
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, spook
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, Brian Raiter
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, Frank Kotler
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, Phil Carmody
Re: NASM 0.99.00 CVS overhaul., Keith Kanios
NASM 0.99.00 CVS overhaul., Keith Kanios
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, Keith Kanios

April 13, 2007

Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, Keith Kanios
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, spook
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, Frank Kotler
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, Keith Kanios
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, spook
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, Frank Kotler

April 12, 2007

Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, spook
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, spook
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, H. Peter Anvin
Re: Feedback about 0.99.00, H. Peter Anvin
Re: Feedback about 0.99.00, keith
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, spook
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, spook
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, accounting
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, anonymous coward
*FRANK* CVS Updated with RDOFF Tools c99 Fix, spook
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, anonymous coward
Feedback about 0.99.00, keith
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, Frank Kotler
Re: NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, Frank Kotler
NASM 64-bit Support is HERE!!!, spook

April 11, 2007

Re: NASM x64 Support Update - April 9th, 2007, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM x64 Support Update - April 9th, 2007, H. Peter Anvin
NASM git tree, H. Peter Anvin
Re: NASM x64 Support Update - April 9th, 2007, H. Peter Anvin

April 10, 2007

Re: NASM x64 Support Update - April 9th, 2007, spook
trader, Childress Freddy
NASM x64 Support Update - April 9th, 2007, spook

April 08, 2007

Re: (no subject), Rohot Tsaganis
reluctantly, Austin H. Isaac
NASM x64 Support Update - April 8th, 2007, spook
Sssenyonga says the farmers are already selling more produce to the hotel apart from getting employment., Charles

April 07, 2007

すごい経験してみたいです。。, 美月
utensil sky, Lara

April 06, 2007

at AM, They include

April 05, 2007

April 03, 2007

April 02, 2007

bleach banister, harbor

News | FAQ | advertise