logo       

Re: vsnprintf and snprintf: msg#00012

lang.nasm.devel

Subject: Re: vsnprintf and snprintf

Ed Beroset wrote:
H. Peter Anvin wrote:

However, I'm reluctant to do so, partly because although these options are useful for the maintainer, they're a pain in the hands of an end-user with a different compiler version.

Given that, I'd probably advocate just dropping -std=c99 completely as you suggested. I hope you don't mind me posting this to the list -- it seemed like you might have intended it to go there.


By all means. I just sent it private because that's the way I received it.

-hpa



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise