Re: vsnprintf and snprintf

Ed Beroset wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > However, I'm reluctant to do so, partly because although these options 
> > are useful for the maintainer, they're a pain in the hands of an 
> > end-user with a different compiler version.
>
> Given that, I'd probably advocate just dropping -std=c99 completely as 
> you suggested.  I hope you don't mind me posting this to the list -- it 
> seemed like you might have intended it to go there.

By all means.  I just sent it private because that's the way I received it.

        -hpa



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/