|
Re: [remote] [control] NASM 0.98.38 error() overflows buff[]: msg#00005lang.nasm.devel
Stanislav Karchebny wrote: On Wednesday 15 December 2004 13:20, D. J. Bernstein wrote: I've fixed it by using vsnprintf() instead. While I was in there, I also changed all of the unsafe sprintf() calls to safer snprintf() calls. Files affected were: preproc.c, disasm.c, ndisasm.c, listing.c, labels.c, nasm.c, and disasm.h. Ed ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [remote] [control] NASM 0.98.38 error() overflows buff[]: 00005, Stanislav Karchebny |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Mailing list still on?: 00005, H. Peter Anvin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [remote] [control] NASM 0.98.38 error() overflows buff[]i: 00005, Stanislav Karchebny |
| Next by Thread: | Mailing list still on?: 00005, H. Peter Anvin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |