Re: autubuild failures in lxp

Ahhhh, okay!
now I'm sure there's a way to 'test' this packaging & building locally?
And also I guess that explains the missing header in luaCOM in the 
tarball...

Ok, I'll be adding those files for lxp soon.

thanks, Martin

> Yup, you should add the necessary header files to the
> lualxp_la_SOURCES line in src/modules/lxp/Makefile.am.  Even though
> the headers are not compiled directly, automake wants to know about
> them so it can put them in the tarball.  It's smart enough to treat .h
> differently than .c.
>
> FYI, if you have some source files that must not be compiled directly,
> but must be included in the distribution, you can add a
> "EXTRA_targetname_SOURCES" line.  For example,
> src/modules/bit/Makefile.am does this with lbitlib.c, because
> lbitlib.c is included directly into lbitlib_wrapper.c.
>
>  




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click