|
Re: autubuild failures in lxp: msg#00054lang.lua.luacheia
On Mar 25, 2004 at 12:45 +0100, Martin Spernau wrote: > Hi Thatcher... > the autobuilds seem to currently fail because they are missing > 'xmlparse.h'..... In a CVS checkout this files is there and eberything > builds.. > Is there something one needs to add in the Makefile,ams to specify which > files are needed in packaging?? Yup, you should add the necessary header files to the lualxp_la_SOURCES line in src/modules/lxp/Makefile.am. Even though the headers are not compiled directly, automake wants to know about them so it can put them in the tarball. It's smart enough to treat .h differently than .c. FYI, if you have some source files that must not be compiled directly, but must be included in the distribution, you can add a "EXTRA_targetname_SOURCES" line. For example, src/modules/bit/Makefile.am does this with lbitlib.c, because lbitlib.c is included directly into lbitlib_wrapper.c. -- Thatcher Ulrich http://tulrich.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | autubuild failures in lxp, Martin Spernau |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: SQLite module, Martin Spernau |
| Previous by Thread: | autubuild failures in lxp, Martin Spernau |
| Next by Thread: | Re: autubuild failures in lxp, Martin Spernau |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |