Re: Beyond wait-and-see

At 12:08 06.01.2004 +0000, Alan Kennedy wrote:
> [Samuele Pedroni]
> > *) get our act together wrt PyXML/XML modules, decide what we know
> > we can have tested/want to support
>
> If someone can put together a 5 to 10 line summary of the goals wrt
> PyXML/XML, I promise to look into it.

good. But is something that can wait untile we are nearer to do a realease.


> [Samuele Pedroni]
> > nice-to-have:
> > - NIO/async I/O support as much as possible in a form compatible
> > with what CPython does
>
> I'm a little disappointed that I have received *zero* feedback about the
> research and design notes I published before Christmas about
> cpython-compatible non-blocking I/O.
>
> http://xhaus.com/alan/python/jynio/

goal and non-goals are reasonable, Brian Zimmer attacked once the problem,
there is some code in the CVS of sf.net/projects/zxPy

If I remember at some point he said there were issues about converting 
beetween ByteBuffers
and Strings, he can probaly say more himself.

> I will eventually get around to an implementation of the algorithms in
> those notes, but it won't be in the next few weeks.

no problem, I posted a long list (I'm trying myself to attack point 1)

regards and thanks.









-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click