|
Re: JRuby on Rails: msg#00050lang.jruby.user
Really it comes down to finding "small interpreter failings". Rails really stresses JRuby. Pick a rails thing (I did *some* work toward getting webrick running with an "empty app"), and run it. When something fails, figure out why by digging through the Ruby code until you can narrow the failure down to a small case. The vast majority of these turn out to be easy to fix, but you'll spend hours trying to make a small example of it.Hmm, isn't there a better approach (and less painful) ? E.g. using ready made test cases like those for Ruby itself or even RoR? - so that one doesn't "invent" new "small cases" but is using the existing one, thus being much more productive? Or am I totally overseeing something? Thanks in advance, Ahmed. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: JRuby on Rails: 00050, David Corbin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: JRuby on Rails: 00050, Charles O Nutter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: JRuby on Railsi: 00050, David Corbin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: JRuby on Rails: 00050, Thomas E Enebo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |