|
Re: Compile Ruby Code?: msg#00045lang.jruby.user
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Kris Leech defenestrated me: > > Thanks Tom for the swift reply, can ByteCode be easily transformed back > in to ruby code? In theory, we need to support compiled ruby in a debugger. How we do this will answer your question. It could be that we allow compiled code to "attach" the original. This would mean that if nothing was attached the debugger 'list'ing would show nothing. This could satisfy your need I think. I am just brainstorming though... I understand why you are asking and I will think about it. -Tom -- + http://www.tc.umn.edu/~enebo +---- mailto:enebo@xxxxxxx ----+ | Thomas E Enebo, Protagonist | "Luck favors the prepared | | | mind." -Louis Pasteur | ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Compile Ruby Code?: 00045, Kris Leech |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Compile Ruby Code?: 00045, Kris Leech |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Compile Ruby Code?i: 00045, Kris Leech |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Compile Ruby Code?: 00045, Kris Leech |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |