Re: Lack of software abstractions

Would this be a way for J applications to be packaged for  
distribution?  Is there any standard way for doing this?

dly
dydre-rieW9WUcm8FFJ04o6PK0Fg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



On 29-Jan-07, at 7:05 PM, Dan Bron wrote:

> I would make a couple of suggestions.  WS.ijs would be more useful  
> if you broke up the new code into several utilities.
>
> The primary utility would be a dyad whose RHA is a filename, and  
> whose LHA is a list of fully-qualifed J names.  The dyad would  
> store the definitions  x  in the file named  by  y  .