|
Re: Lack of software abstractions: msg#00268lang.j.general
dly wrote: > This topic began with a reference to this article > by Paul Robinson > http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/24.54.html >... > A discussion of this nature is neither a complaint nor a Request for > Change. > > Donna Certainly lots to discuss! However, a message like the one below is certainly a complaint and a request for change. On this topic, I wrote up some notes in http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Guides/General_FAQ/Workspace . ========================= http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/general/2007-January/028713.html I agree. I know what can be done but in 2007 I didn't think I needed to start from scratch. I guess no money is spent on creating software application for software engineers. dly dydre at sympatico.ca On 26-Jan-07, at 8:15 PM, Joe Tibollo wrote: > I don't think it is all that trivial. > > Ideally, it would be nice to save everything in the workspace and > reload > it with a simple > ")save" and ")load" . Having to write a function to query all > locales > and package all objects to a single file is a serious undertaking - > perhaps that is why it still has yet to be done... |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: cgi stdin buffer: 00268, bill lam |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Lack of software abstractions: 00268, Devon McCormick |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Lack of software abstractionsi: 00268, dly |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Lack of software abstractions: 00268, PGauthier-oQFXY4Vn4Wdl57MIdRCFDg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |