|
RE: Lack of software abstractions: msg#00255lang.j.general
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. Chris, as always, thanks for your kind support and guidance. Just a question - I really would like to get the hang of the project builder. So far I have tried building the sample application twice and was unsuccessful. Both times, I'm sure, the problem was the bug that you mentioned. Is the bug corrected now? Show I try the lab again? Regards, Joe -----Original Message----- From: general-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Chris Burke Sent: Sat 27/01/2007 3:58 PM To: General forum Cc: Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] Lack of software abstractions Joe Tibollo wrote: > My apologies Chris, I didn't realize I was complaining. > > Just for the record, I have no complaints. I was only trying to join the conversation started by Bjorn and I happenend to mention a few areas of interest to me... Joe Thanks. I think the original question was of the form "I have problem X and the solution is Y". Sometimes, the proper response is "problem X is solved by doing Z", where Y and Z are quite different. This just seems to me to be the core of the workspace/script issue, and I responded accordingly. But you should know that we take the issues that were discussed seriously. For example, a lot of work has been done recently on packaging and distributing addons (user contributions) and the base library. A few months ago, getting any addons or library updates was a tedious process, for both developer and end user. Now, the whole process is largely automated. You can access your addon in Project Manager, make changes, click a button in the new SVN dialog in PM to commit, the addon is built automatically on the server, and is immediately available to the end user. In general, PM and its updates/replacements etc, is an important part of the IDE. There are lots of improvements we can make, in particular to make building a simple application completely trivial - an issue that you raised earlier, and which I believe is your main concern. Chris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Lack of software abstractions: 00255, Chris Burke |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Lack of software abstractions: 00255, bill lam |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Lack of software abstractionsi: 00255, Chris Burke |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Lack of software abstractions: 00255, bill lam |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |