|
Re: Lack of software abstractions: msg#00238lang.j.general
DB; If you work on the reponsibility part, there's no reason to be afraid. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |\/| Randy A MacDonald | APL: If you can say it, it's done.. (ram) |/\| ramacd-Ec9gIrrHw6csA/PxXw9srA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | |\ | | The only real problem with APL is that BSc(Math) UNBF'83 | it is "still ahead of its time." Sapere Aude | - Morten Kromberg Natural Born APL'er | Demo website: http://156.34.66.254/ -----------------------------------------------------(INTP)----{ gnat }- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Bron" <jf-pk/dOXfYWDBeoWH0uzbU5w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <general-eCoxsOKuxbJl57MIdRCFDg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 5:36 PM Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] Lack of software abstractions > RH = Roger, DB = Me > > RH> It has not yet been done because the style of > RH> working in J is different from the style in APL > ... > DB> It has yet to be done because that's not how we > DB> do it in J. That's how you do it in APL. > > RH> everything, done in 3 lines: > ... > DB> It took me ... 3 lines. > > > You know, I don't know if this makes me proud or afraid. > > > -Dan > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: Lack of software abstractions: 00238, Joe Tibollo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Lack of software abstractions: 00238, ramacd |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Lack of software abstractionsi: 00238, Devon McCormick |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Lack of software abstractions: 00238, ramacd |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |