Re: Lack of software abstractions

2007/1/25, Joe Tibollo <JTibollo-3+VwCW+EVOqLZvtRG1ECog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Bjorn and Raul:
>
> I develop software and have programmed for years in a number of different
> languages.  My favourite languages, somewhat in order, have been APL, J,
> Realizer, Delphi, VB, C#, C++.  Of all these languages I have enjoyed
> writing complete applications in APL, Realizer, VB, and Delphi.  I like J
> very much but so far have found it difficult to share software written in
> J  with others.
>
> Using script files in J is a lot more difficult than using script files in
> VB.  Until such time that I can use J script files to build a complete
> application, and package it so that I can share it with someone else,
> without including the entire J distribution library, J will be a package I
> thoroughly enjoy for private use only. I suspect others must feel the same
> way.
--------------------------


There are no problems just installing the complete J system and then call
your scripts.
You may of course spend time scaling it down but what is the point.
By having the whole system where your system is running makes life very
easy.

I recently visited a company I did some J work for ca 10 years ago.

They are still running the system unchanged.

The system is based on J calling several programs and shuffling data between
machines using FTP and in some cases calling a small VB routine I made that
sends and receives  files in e-mail.
Only way I did know at the time how to use e-mail from J at the time.

The J scripts start in J runtime called from bat files controlled from a
scheduler.

I described this system in Toronto on the J conference eons ago.

Never had any complaints or even heard much about this for a number of years
now.
Actually thought it had been replaced by something else by now.
There is no J skills at this company whatsoever.