Re[2]: Data.ByteString candidate 3

Hello Simon,

Tuesday, April 25, 2006, 5:34:20 PM, you wrote:

> Good point, and that's why using the Data.PackedString hierarchy was
> nice, because it accomodated various different character widths.  I 
> quite like

>    Data.ByteString
>    Data.PackedString.Latin1
>    Data.PackedString.UTF8
>    Data.PackedString.UCS4
>    etc.

i think these module names are great - first work with just Word8,
while Data.PackedString.* modules works with different Char
representations


-- 
Best regards,
 Bulat                            mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@xxxxxxxxx