Re[2]: FPS 0.3

Hello Simon,

Friday, April 21, 2006, 2:22:28 PM, you wrote:

>> are you sure that ByteString can replace PackedString? ;)

> are you referring to the fact that ByteString doesn't handle the full 
> Unicode range, but PackedString does?

yes

> My response to that would be to use [Char] if you want Unicode. 
> PackedString was slower than [Char] in many cases anyway :-)

so why you say that it's a "replacement for Data.PackedString" ?

let's omit also arrays. ByteString is not replaces them but who
worries? :)


-- 
Best regards,
 Bulat                            mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@xxxxxxxxx