|
Re: "FastPackedString" considered harmful: msg#00110lang.haskell.libraries
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Seth Kurtzberg wrote: > I agree with Don about the current name. If FastPackString is confusing > because it isn't a string, doesn't ByteString suffers from the same > problem? > I think more accurately FPS is confusing because most people assume string = string of characters, whereas FPS is a string of bytes? -- flippa@xxxxxxxxxxx Ivanova is always right. I will listen to Ivanova. I will not ignore Ivanova's recomendations. Ivanova is God. And, if this ever happens again, Ivanova will personally rip your lungs out! |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re[2]: implementation of UTF-8 conversion for text I/O: iconv vs hand-made: 00110, Bulat Ziganshin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: implementation of UTF-8 conversion for text I/O: iconv vs hand-made: 00110, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: "FastPackedString" considered harmfuli: 00110, Udo Stenzel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: "FastPackedString" considered harmful: 00110, Bulat Ziganshin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |