logo       

Re: inits: msg#00019

lang.haskell.libraries

Subject: Re: inits

Sebastian Sylvan wrote:
On 4/7/06, Spencer Janssen <spencerjanssen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Earlier today on the #haskell IRC channel, Tim Toorop (bolrod on
#haskell) pointed out that Data.List.inits is rather slow, and
proposed an alternative. After some collabrative tweaking, we came up
with the following:

inits xs = [] : (zipWith take [1..] $ map (const xs) xs)
This function seems to perform significantly better. For example, the
program below takes about 15 seconds with the old inits, and only 3
seconds with the new version (tested with GHC 6.4.1 and -O2).

main = print $ sum $ map sum $ inits [1..7000]
As this version performs much better and will work as a drop in
replacement, I suggest that it be included in the hierarchical
libraries.


That's quite a bit faster on my machine as well. I think the following
slight variation may be a bit clearer, though:
inits xs = [] : zipWith take [1..length xs] (repeat xs)

--
Sebastian Sylvan
+46(0)736-818655
UIN: 44640862
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
The length xs wont work on infinite lists.
So you can't do :
take 100 (length (inits [1..]))

--
Tim Toorop


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise